You are using our mobile site, click here to use our Desktop view.
When Aston Villa sold Ollie Watkins to Al Hilal for around £51m on 30 August and replaced him with Nicolas Jackson from Chelsea for €55m, plenty of people called it a downgrade. Watkins was Villa's talisman, their guarantee of goals. Jackson was Chelsea's nearly-man — talented, erratic and never quite trusted.
Two months later, the deal looks very different. Jackson scored Villa's second goal after just four minutes at Old Trafford on Sunday, in a wild 4–4 draw with Manchester United. It was the kind of goal Watkins used to score for Villa: sharp movement, first-time finish, no hesitation. And it was not a one-off moment — Jackson has given Unai Emery's attack exactly what it lost when Watkins left: a striker who runs the channels, presses from the front, and finishes when the chance comes.
The contrast with Chelsea is what makes this transfer so interesting. Chelsea let Jackson go and have spent the season searching for a reliable No. 9. Villa, meanwhile, banked roughly the same money they spent, swapped one striker for another, and kept their attack functioning. That is not luck. That is recruitment with a plan — something Villa have done better than most of the Premier League's big spenders in recent years.
There will be harder tests for Jackson than a chaotic afternoon at Old Trafford. But the early evidence is clear: Villa did not downgrade. They reinvested, and the player they bought is already scoring the goals they needed him to score. Chelsea's gamble — that they could do better than Jackson — looks worse every week.
Written by
Football News stories today